Current issue
Online First
Archive
Instructions for Authors
About the Journal
Contact
1/2013 vol. 58
Stats
CC-BY 4.0
Get citation
ORIGINAL PAPER
Comparative analysis of coverage degree of objects sprayed with selected double-stream sprayers
A. Szewczyk 1
,
 
D. Łuczycka 1
,
 
K. Lejman 1
,
 
B. Cieniawska 1
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu, Instytut Inżynierii Rolniczej ul Chełmońskiego 37/41, 51-630 Wrocław
 
 
Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2013;58(1):172-177
 
Article (PDF)
References (20)
 
KEYWORDS
double-stream sprayer
comparison of sprayers
fall liquid
coverage degree
 
ABSTRACT
The study presents results of the comparative analysis of two sprayers acting on the basis of the coverage degree of sprayed objects. Two double-stream sprayers differing in sprayed streams setting were selected to research. It was the sprayer IDKT of company Lechler and HiSpeed of company Agrotop. During the tests the sprayer IDKT was deflected from vertical so as to obtain the same setting of spray streams as in the case of sprayer HiSpeed. The aim of this study was to compare the degree of coverage of objects sprayed at the same setting of sprayed streams of both sprayers. Comparative analysis of the results of two sprayers selected for studies did not show a large diversity of sprayed objects coverage.
REFERENCES (20)
1.
Butler Ellis M.C., Swan T., Miler P.C.H., Waddelow S., Bradley A. Tuck C.R.: Design Factors affecting Spray Characteristics and Drift Performance of Air Induction Nozzles. Biosystems Engineering, 2002, 82(3). 289-296.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Cross J.V., Berrie A.M.: Spray Deposits and efficaty of a Tunnel sprayer at three volume rates (50, 100, 200 l/ha) in comparison with an axial Fan sprayer (50 l/ha) on Apple. A.N.P.P.-B.C.P.C. Strasbourg, 1993. 273–280.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Crowe G., Downey T.D., Ken Giles D., Sloughter D.C.: An Electronic Sensor to Characterize Transient Response of Nozzle Injection for Pesticde Spraying. Transactions of the ASAE, 2005, 48(1), 73-82.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Crowe T.G., Downey D., Giles D.K. Digital Device and Technique for Sensing Distribution of Spray Deposition. Transaction of the ASAE, 2005, 48(6), 2085-2093.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Derksen R.C., Frantz J., Ranger C.M., Locke C., Zhu H., Krause C.R.: Comparing Greenhouse Handgun Delivery to Poinsettias by Spray Volume and Quality. Transaction of the ASABE, 2008, 51(1), 27–35.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Fietsam J.F.W., Young B.G., Steffen R.W.: Differential Response of Herbicide Drift Reduction Nozzles to Drift Control Agents with Glyphosate. Trans. of the ASAE, 2004, 47(5), 1405-1411.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Foque D., Nuyttens D.: Effects of nozzle type and spray angle on spray deposition in ivy pot plants. Pest Management Science, 2011, 67(2), 199-208.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Ganzelmeier H., Nordmeyer H. Innovationen in der Applikationstechnik. In: Tiedemann A., Heitefuss R., Feldmann F.: Pflanzenproduktion im Wandel- Wandel im Pflanzenschutz. Deutsche Phytomedizinische Gesellschaft, Braunschweig, Germany, 2008. ISBEN 978-3-941261-00-6, 138-149.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Godyń A., Hołownicki R., Doruchowski G.: Ocena rozkładu cieczy opryskowej w sadzie jabłoniowym wykonana za pomocą papieru wodnoczułego. Inżynieria Rolnicza, 2008, 4(102), 299-305.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Hołownicki R., Doruchowski G., Świechowski W., Jaeken P.: Methods of Evaluation of Spray Deposit and Coverage on Artificial Targets. Electronic J. Polish Agric. Universities, 2002, 5(1). Ser. Agric. Eng. (www.ejpau.media.pl).
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Hołownicki R.: System automatycznej zamiany typu rozpylacza w zależności od prędkości wiatru dla opryskiwaczy polowych i sadowniczych. Racjonalna technika ochrony roślin. Mat. Konf., 2003, 165-175.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Koszel M., Sawa J.: Wpływ parametrów pracy rozpylaczy płaskostrumieniowych na spektrum śladu kropel. Inżynieria Rolnicza, 2006, 5 (80), 313-319.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Langenakens J.J., Ramon H., De Beardemaeker J.: A Model for Measuring the Effect of Tire Pressure and Driving Speed on Horizontal Sprayer Boom Movements and Spray Pattern. Transaction of the ASAE, 1995, 38 (1), 65-72.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Nuyttens D., Baetens K., De Schampheleieand M, Sonck B.: Effect of nozzle type, size and pressure on spray droplet characteristics. Biosystems Engineering, 2007, 97(3), 333-345.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Rowiński R. S.: Kwestie standaryzacji metod w badaniach nad znoszeniem. Materiały konferencyjne. Racjonalna technika ochrony roślin. Skierniewice, 2002, s. 94-103.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Sánchez-Hermosilla J., Rincón V. J., Páez F., Fernández M. 2012. Comparative spray deposits by manually pulled trolley sprayer and a spray gun in greenhouse tomato crops. Crop Protection. Nr 31. 119-124.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Szewczyk A., Wilczok G.: Teoretyczny i rzeczywisty rozkład cieczy dla wybranych parametrów ustawienia rozpylacza. Inżynieria Rolnicza, 2007, 9 (96), 265-271.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Szewczyk A., Wilczok G.: Teoretyczny opis rozkładu rozpylonej cieczy w warunkach działania czołowego strumienia powietrza. Inżynieria Rolnicza, 2008, 5(103), 292-299.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Szewczyk A. Analiza ustawienia, parametrów i warunków pracy rozpylacza w aspekcie jakości opryskiwania upraw polowych. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego we Wrocławiu, 2010. ISSN 1898-151.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Womac A.R., Smith C.W., Mulrooney J.E.: Foliar Spray Banding Characteristics. Transaction of the ASAE, 2004, 47(1), 37-44.
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:2719-423X
ISSN:1642-686X
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2025 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top