ORIGINAL PAPER
Density and degree of damage to leaves and shoots of some plum and pear cultivars by eriophyoid mites (Eriophyoidea)
More details
Hide details
1
Research Institute of Horticulture, Department of Pomology, ul. Pomologiczna 18, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland
Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2014;59(3):5-7
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
In 2011-2013, a study was conducted on the colonization and damage to the leaves and shoots of plum trees by the plum rust mite Vasates fockeui (Nal.) and on the damage to the leaves of pear trees by the pear-leaf blister mite Eriophyes piri (Pgst.). Observations were carried out in the Experimental Ecological Orchard of the Research Institute of Horticulture, located in Nowy Dwór-Parcela near Skierniewice. Colonization of leaves by the plum rust mite was checked four times during the growing season, from May to August. In late July or early August, there was executed an assessment of the damage to the leaves and shoots of 4 plum cultivars (‘Herman’, ‘Żółta Afaska’, ‘Čačanska Rana’ and ‘Valjevka’) and 6 pear cultivars (‘Faworytka’, ‘Radana’, ‘Konferencja’, ‘Erika’, ‘Concorde’ and ‘Amfora’). The damage was assessed on a 4-point grade scale, where 0 - meant no symptoms of feeding by the mites, and 3 - severe damage (90% discoloured leaves of pear trees, and premature drop of plum tree leaves). The highest degree of damage to plum trees by the plum rust mite was recorded in the cultivar ‘Herman’, and the lowest in ‘Valjevka’. The average extent of grade 3 damage to shoots was 31.8% and 2.7%, respectively. On pear trees, leaves most severely damaged by the pear-leaf blister mite were observed in the cultivars ‘Amfora’ and ‘Erika’, while the lowest degree of damage was shown by the cultivars ‘Radana’ and ‘Konferencja’.
REFERENCES (9)
1.
Boczek J.: Zarys akarologii rolniczej (Outline of agricultural acarology). Wyd. Nauk. PWN, Warszawa 1980: 358.
2.
Easterbrook, M. A.: Damage and control of Eriophyoid mites in apple and pear. In: Helle, W. (Ed.), Eriophyoid Mites. Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Elsevier, Am-sterdam Oxford, New York, Tokyo, 1996: 527-541.
3.
Zawadzki W.: Biologia i szkodliwość szpecieli (Acarina: Eriophyoidea) na wybranych roślinach z rodzaju Prunus (Biology and harmfulness eriophyoid (Acarina: Eriophyoidea) on the selected plants of the genus Prunus). Praca dokt. SGGW, 1977: pp. 113.
4.
Suski Z. W., Badowska-Czubik T.: Population trend of the apple rust mite, Aculus schlechtendali (Nal.) and plum rust mite, Aculus Fockeui (Nal.) in Poland. In: D. Kropczyńska, J. Boczek, A. Tomczyk (ed.), „The Acari. Physiological and Ecological Aspects of Acari-Host Relationships”, Dabor, Warszawa, 1995: 577-579.
5.
Boczek J.: Niechemiczne metody zwalczania szkodników (Non-chemical methods of pest control). Wyd. SGGW, Warszawa, 1992: 243.
6.
Gilmer R. M., McEwen F. L., Chlorotic fleck, an eriophyid mite injury of myrobalan plum. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1958, Vol. 51(3): 335-337.
7.
Badowska-Czubik T., Pala E., Rejnus M.: Liczebność pordzewiacza śliwowego (Vasates fockeui) na różnych odmianach śliwy (The number of plum rust mite (Vasates fockeui) on various varietes of plum). Ogólnopol. Konf. Ochr. Rośl. Sad., Skierniewice, 19-20 lutego 1998: 122-123.
8.
Daniel C., Linder C., Wyss E.: Autumn acaricide applications as a new strategy to control the pear leaf blister mite Eriophyes pyri. Crop Protection, 2007, Vol. 26: 1532-1537.
9.
Laffi F., Ermini P.: Prove di lotta nei confronti di Eriophyes pyri ed E. pseudoinsidoisus in pereti dell‘Emilia-Romagna. Informatore Fitopatologico, 1998, Vol. 48(12): 55-58.