ORIGINAL PAPER
Effect of strip tillage and weeding method on weed infestation of silage maize planted after winter cover crop
More details
Hide details
1
Poznań University of Life Sciences, Department of Agronomy, ul. Dojazd 11, 60-632 Poznań, Poland
2
Industrial Institute of Agricultural Engineering, ul. Starołęcka 31, 60-963 Poznań, Poland
Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2017;62(4):90-93
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
A field experiment was conducted in 2012 to 2013 to determine the effect of tillage, including deep strip tillage, shallow strip tillage and conventional tillage, and weed control method (untreated control, mechanical, chemical) on weed infestation of maize planted after winter cover crop being intended for silage. Strip tillage was executed with the use of a universal active tool for the strip tillage and mechanical interrow cultivation. Cultivated straps were 25 cm wide and 20cm deep at deep strip tillage, and 25cm wide and 3-5cm deep at shallow strip tillage. Conventional tillage was performed with moldboard plow at a depth of 20cm. Strip tillage significantly reduced weed biomass in maize as compared to conventional tillage. Weed biomass and density after mechanical and chemical treatment was similar and significantly lower than at untreated control. The new developed active tool for the strip tillage and mechanical interrow cultivation ensures a good efficiency of weed control in maize planted after winter rye cover crop.
REFERENCES (12)
1.
Barberi P., Mazzoncini M.: Changes in weed community composition as influenced by cover crop and management system in continuous corn. Weed Sci., 2001, 49, 491-499.
2.
Hendrix B.J., Young B. G., Chong S.: Weed management in strip tillage corn. Agron. J., 2004, 96, 229-235.
3.
Krueger E., Ochsner T., Porter P., Baker J.: Winter rye cover crop management influences on soil water, soil nitrate and corn development. Agron. J., 2011, 103, 316-323.
4.
Krueger E., Ochsner T., Baker J., Porter P., Reicosky D.: Rye-corn silage double-cropping reduces corn yield but improves environmental impacts. Agron. J., 2012, 104, 888-896.
5.
Majchrzak L. Skrzypczak G., Pudełko J.: Wpływ uproszczeń w uprawie roli na plonowanie kukurydzy. Cz. I. Uprawa kukurydzy w plonie głównym. PTPN, Prace komisji nauk rolniczych i komisji nauk leśnych, 2002, 93, 39-51.
6.
Majchrzak L. Skrzypczak G., Pudełko J.: Wpływ uproszczeń w uprawie roli na plonowanie kukurydzy. Cz. II. Uprawa kukurydzy w plonie wtórnym. PTPN, Prace komisji nauk rolniczych i komisji nauk leśnych, 2003, 95, 121-128.
7.
Morris N., Miller P., Orson J., Froud-Williams R.: The adoption of non-inversion tillage systems in the United Kingdom and the agronomic impact on soil, crops and the environment - A review. Soil Till. Res., 2010, 108, 1-15.
8.
Piechota T.: Reakcja kukurydzy na pasową uprawę roli w warunkach niedoborów wody. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln., 2011, 559, 153-160.
9.
Piechota T.: Wpływ międzyplonu na zachwaszczenie kukurydzy w różnych systemach uprawy roli. Prog. Plant Prot., 2011, 1, 469-472.
10.
Piechota T., Zbytek Z., Kowalski M.: Effect of strip tillage and mechanical weeding on yield of silage maize planted after winter cover crop. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Engng, 2016, 4, 120-123.
11.
Piechota T., Zbytek Z., Kowalski M., Dach J.: Wpływ pasowej uprawy roli i mechanicznego zwalczania chwastów na fizyczne właściwości gleby w uprawie kukurydzy w plonie wtórnym. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Engng, 2013, 4, 104-108.
12.
Zbytek Z., Talarczyk W., Łowiński Ł.: Wpływ zastosowania różnych elementów roboczych na wytrzymałość konstrukcji uniwersalnej ramy nośnej maszyny rolniczej. Technika Rolnicza Ogrodnicza Leśna, 2013, 1, 28.