Current issue
Online First
Archive
Instructions for Authors
Guide for Authors
Peer Review Policy
Research Ethics Policy
Ghostwriting and Guest Authorship
Copyright
Open Access Policy
Plagiarism
About the Journal
Aim and Scope
Scientific Board
Publisher
Editorial Board
Indexing in Databases
Personal Data Protection
Repository Policy
Contact
ORIGINAL PAPER
Healthiness of pea seeds variety Tarchalska after bacterial inoculation
1
University of Agriculture in Krakow, Department of Agricultural Environment Protection al. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Kraków, Poland
Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2018;63(2):39-42
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The aim of the study was to determine the health status of seeds and the quality of seedlings of pea of Tarchalska variety after the use of Nitragina vaccine and a non-commercial bacterial vaccine IUNG. It was observed that in 2010 treatment with vaccines reduced the amount of seeds with pathogenic changes. Fungi belonging to 11 species were isolated from the pea seeds. Alternaria alternata species and Penicillium genus were the most abundant.
REFERENCES (35)
1.
GUS 2018. Użytkowanie gruntów i powierzchnia zasiewów w 2017 r. Warszawa: 86. https://stat.gov.pl/files/gfx/....
2.
Florek J.: Możliwości wykorzystania roślin strączkowych do produkcji pasz w Polsce. Roczniki Naukowe SERiA, 2017, XIX (4), 40-45.
3.
Corre-Hellou G., Crozat Y.: N2 fixation and N supply in organic pea (Pisum sativum L.) cropping systems as affected by weeds and peaweevil (Sitona lineatus L.). Eur. J. Agron., 2005, 22, 449-458.
4.
People M.B., Brockwell J., HerridgeI D.F., Rochester J., Alves B.J.R., S. Urquiaga S., Boddey R.M., Dakora F.D., Bhattarai S., Maskey S.L., Sampet C., Rerkasem B., Khan D.F., Hauggaard-Nielsen H., Jensen E.S.: The contributions of nitrogen-fixing crop legumes to the productivity of agricultural systems. Symbiosis, 2009, 48 (1-3), 1-17.
5.
Martyniuk S.: Naukowe i praktyczne aspekty symbiozy roślin strączkowych z bakteriami brodawkowymi. Polish J. Agronomy, 2012, 9, 17-22.
6.
Deshwal V.K., Pandey P., Kang S.C., Maheshwari D.K.: Rhizobia as a biological control agent against soil borne plant pathogenic fungi. Indian J. Experimental Biol., 2003, 41, 1160-1164.
7.
Beneduzi A., Ambrosini A., Passaglia L.M.P.: Plant growthpromoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Gen. Mol. Biol., 2012, 35, 4 (suppl), 1044-1051.
8.
Ahemad M., Kibbret M.: Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Current perspective. J. King Saud University – Sci., 2014, 26, 1-20.
9.
Gupta G., Parihar S.S., Ahirwar N.K., Snehi S.K., Singh V.: Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): Current and Future Prospects for Development of Sustainable Agriculture. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol., 2015, 7, 096–102. doi:10.4172/1948-5948.1000188.
10.
Dąbrowska B., Pokojska H., Suchorska-Tropiło K.: Metody Laboratoryjnej Oceny Materiału Siewnego. Wyd. SGGW, Warszawa, 2000.
11.
Tylkowska K., Dorna H., Szopińska D.: Patologia Nasion. Wyd. AR im. A. Cieszkowskiego w Poznaniu, Poznań, 2007.
12.
Townsend G.R., Heuberger J.W.: Methods for estimating losses caused by diseases in fungicide experiments. Pl. Dis. Rep., 1943, 27, 340-343.
13.
Fassatiova O.: Grzyby Mikroskopowe w Mikrobiologii Technicznej. WNT, Warszawa, 1983.
14.
Barnett H.L., Hunter B.B.: Ilustrated Genera of Imperfect Fungi. Burgess Publishing Co. Minneapolis, 1972.
15.
Marcinkowska J.: Oznaczanie Rodzajów Grzybów Ważnych w Patologii Roślin. Fundacja Rozwój SGGW, Warszawa, 2003.
16.
Strażyński P., Mrówczyński M. (red.): Metodyka integrowanej ochrony grochu siewnego dla producentów. IOR-PIB Poznań, 2014, 68.
17.
Patten C.L., Glick B.R.: Role of Pseudomonas putida Indoleacetic Acid in Development of the Host Plant Root System. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2002, 68, 3795-3801.
18.
Li J., Ovakim D.H., Charles T.C., Glick B. R.: An ACC deaminase minus mutant of Enterobacter cloacae UW4 no longer promotes root elongation. Curr. Microbiol., 2000, 41, 101-105.
19.
Pawar V.A., Pawar P.R., Bhosale A.M., Chavan S.V.: Effect of Rhizobium on Seed Germination and Growth of Plants. J. Acad. Industrial Res., 2014, 3 (2), 84-88.
20.
Penrose D.M., Glick B.R.: Methods for isolating and characterizing ACC deaminase-containing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Physiol. Plant, 2003, 118, 10-15.
21.
Kalitkiewicz A., Kępińska E.: Wykorzystanie ryzobakterii do stymulacji wzrostu roślin. Biotechnol., 2008, 2, 102–114.
22.
Kosicka D., Wolna-Maruwka A., Trzeciak M.: Wpływ preparatów mikrobiologicznych na glebę oraz wzrost i rozwój roślin. Kosmos Problemy Nauk Biol., 2015, 64 (2), 327-335.
23.
Marcinkowska J.: Fungi occurrence on seeds of field pea. Acta Mycol., 2008, 43 (1), 77-89.
24.
Okorski A., Majchrzak B.: Grzyby zasiedlające nasiona grochu siewnego po zastosowaniu preparatu mikrobiologicznego EM 1. Prog. Plant Prot./Post. Ochr. Roślin, 2008, 48 (4), 1314-1318.
25.
Ozgonen H., Gulcu M.: Determination of mycoflora of pea (Pisum sativum) seeds and the effects of Rhizobium leguminosorum on fungal pathogens of peas. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 2011, 10 (33), 6235-6240.
26.
Wilman K., Stępień Ł., Fabiańska I., Kachlicki P.: Plantpathogenic fungi in seeds of different pea cultivars in Poland. Arh. Hig. Rada. Toksikol., 2014, 65, 329-338. DOI: 10.2478/10004-1254-65-2014-2480.
27.
Horoszkiewicz-Janka J., Jajor E., Perek A.: Wpływ zapraw chemicznych na ograniczanie chorób grochu. Fragm. Agron., 2013, 30 (4), 36-45.
28.
Lejman A., Ogórek R., Sobkowicz P.: Effects of Mechanical Weed Control in Barley-Pea Mixture on Colonization of Pea Seeds by Fungi, Part 2. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2015, 24 (6), 2485-2492. doi: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes....
29.
Czyżewska S.: The effect of pathogenic seed-borne fungi on green pea (Pisum sativum L.) emergence. Acta Hortic. 1987, 215, 123-130. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1987.215.16 https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaH....
30.
Begum N., Alvi K.Z., Haque M.I., Raja M.U., Chohan S.: Evaluation of Mycoflora Associated with Pea Seeds and Some Control Measures. Plant Pathol. J., 2004, 3, 48-51.
31.
Marcinkowska J., Kuczkowski J.: Porażenie wybranych odmian wąsolistnych grochu siewnego przez patogeny w zależności od zwartości łanu. Biul. IHAR, 2006, 242, 253-260.
32.
Tivoli B., Banniza S.: Comparison of the epidemiology of ascochyta blights in grain legumes. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 2007, 119, 59-76. doi: 10.1007/s10658-007-9117-9.
33.
Moussart A., Tivoli B., Lemarchand E., Deneufbourg F., Roi S., Sicard G.: Role of seed infection by the Ascochyta blight pathogen of dried pea (Mycosphaerella pinodes) in seedling emergence, early disease development and transmission of the disease to aerial plant parts. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 1998, 104, 93-102. doi: 10.1023/A:1008673914537.
34.
Kumar N.S., Banniza S.: Assessment of the Effect of Seed Infection with Ascochyta pisi on Pea in Western Canada. Front. Plant Sci., 2017, 8, 933, 1-7. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00933.
35.
Marcinkowska J., Szyrmer J.: Etiologia zgorzeli siewek grochu ozimego (Pisum sativum L. var. arvense (L.) Poir.). Biuletyn IHAR, 1992, 184, 89-92.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2719-423X |
| ISSN: | 1642-686X |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
