Current issue
Online First
Archive
Instructions for Authors
Guide for Authors
Peer Review Policy
Research Ethics Policy
Ghostwriting and Guest Authorship
Copyright
Open Access Policy
Plagiarism
About the Journal
Aim and Scope
Scientific Board
Publisher
Editorial Board
Indexing in Databases
Personal Data Protection
Repository Policy
Contact
ORIGINAL PAPER
Comparison of the competitiveness of modern and old winter wheat varieties i relation to weeds
Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2009;54(3):60-67
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The aim of the research was to compare the competitive ability against weeds of some modern and old winter wheat varieties. The study was conducted in 2004-2007 at the Experimental Station of Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation State Research Institute in Osiny (Lublin province) on the experimental fields used in ecological way since 1994. In the study 6 modern winter wheat varieties: Sukces, Zyta, Roma, Kobra, Mewa, Korweta and 4 old varieties: Kujawianka Więcławicka, Wysokolitewka Sztywnosioma, Ostka Kazimierska, spelt var. Schwabenkorn were tested. The qualitative and quantitative analysis of weed infestation, biometric measures of wheat plants and canopy architecture study were done. 77 evaluation of Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR) was carried out in the canopy of different winter wheat varieties The grain yields of winter wheat varieties were assessed. The biggest competitive ability regarding the weeds characterized the modern varieties: Sukces, Zyta, Mewa, and old varieties: spelt (var. Schwabenkorn) and Ostka Kazimierska. In spite of more favourable parameters of growth and development of old varieties proving their competitiveness due to weeds, low yielding potential of these varieties limits their using in practice.
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Balyan R.S., Malik R.K., Panwar R.S., Singh S.: Competitive ability of winter wheat cultivars with wild oat (Avena ludoviciana). Weed Sci., 39, s.154-158, 1993.
2.
Blackshaw R. E., Semach G. P., O'Donovan J. T.: Utilization of wheat seed rate to manage redstem filaree (Erodium cicutarium) in a zero-till cropping system. Weed Technol., 14, s. 389-396, 2000.
3.
Bond W., Grundy A. C: Non-chemical weed management in organic farming system. Weed Res., 41, s. 383-405, 2001.
4.
Carlson H.L., Hill J.E.: Wild oat (Avenafatua) competition in spring wheat: plant density effects. Weed Sci., 33, s. 176-181, 1985.
5.
Causens R., Brain P., 0'Donovan J. T., O'Sullivan P.A.: The use of biologically realistic equations to describe the effects of weed density and relative time of emergence on crop yield. Weed Sci., 35, s. 720-725, 1987.
6.
Challaiah Burnside O. C, Wicks G. A., Johnson V. A. 1986. Competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci., 34, 689-693.
7.
Christensen S.: Weed suppression ability of spring barley varieties. Weed Res., 35, s. 241-247, 1995.
8.
Davies D.H.K., Welsh J.P.: Weed control in organic cereals and pulses. Organic cereals and pulses. Eds. Younie D., Taylor B.R., Welsh J.P., Wilkinson J.M. Chalcombe Publications, Lincoln, s.77-114, 2001.
9.
Didon U. M. E.: Variation between barley cultivars in early response to weed competition. J. Agronomy & Crop Science, 188, s. 176-184, 2002.
10.
Duer I.: Znaczenie chwastów i strategia ich ograniczania w gospodarstwie ekologicznym. W: Rolnictwo ekologiczne szansą na polską specjalność. Mat. szkol. IUNG Puławy 86/02, s. 21-26, 2002.
11.
Eisele J.-A., Kopke U.: Choice of cultivars in organic farming: New criteria for winter wheat ideotypes. Planzenbauwissenschaften 1, s. 19-24, 1997.
12.
Feledyn-Szewczyk B., Duer I.: Ocena konkurencyjności odmian pszenicy ozimej uprawianej w ekologicznym systemie produkcji w stosunku do chwastów. J. Res. Applic. Agricult. Eng., 51 (2), s. 30-35, 2006.
13.
Feledyn-Szewczyk B., Duer I.: Konkurencyjność wybranych odmian pszenicy ozimej w stosunku do chwastów testowana w warunkach rolnictwa ekologicznego. Biul. IHAR, 247, s. 3-13, 2008.
14.
Hakansson S.: Competitive effects and competitiveness in annual plant stands. Measurement methods and problems related to plant density. Swedish J. Agric. Res., 27, s. 53-73, 1997.
15.
Hucl P.: Response to weed control by four spring genotypes differing in competitive ability. Can. J. Plant Sci., 78, s. 171-173, 1998.
16.
Lemerle D., Verbeek B., Cousens R.D., Coombers N.E.: The potential for selecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weeds. Weed Res., 36, s. 505-513, 1996.
17.
0'Donovan J.T., Newman J. C, Harker K. N., Black-show R. E., McAndrew D.W.: Effect of barley plant density on wild oat interference, shoot biomass and seed yield under zero tillage. Can. J. of Plant Sci. 79, s. 655-662, 1999.
18.
O'Donovan J. T., Harker K. N., Clayton G. W., Hali L. M. Wild oat (Avena fatua) interference in barley (Hordeum vulgare) is influenced by barley variety and seeding rate. Weed Technol., 14, s. 624-629, 2000.
19.
O'Donovan J. T., Blackshaw R. E., Harker K. N.Clayton G. W., McKenzie R.: Variable plant establishment contributes to differences in competitiveness with wild oat among wheat and barley varieties. Can. J. Plant Sci., 85, s. 771-776, 2005.
20.
O'Donovan J.T., Blackshaw R.E., Harker K. N., Clayton G.W., Moyer J.R., Dosdall L.M., Maurice D.C., Turkington T.K. Integrated approaches to managing weeds in spring-sown crops in western Canada. Crop Protection 26, s. 390-398, 2007.
21.
Patriquin D.G.: Weed control in organic farming systems. W: Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches, Altieri M.A., Liebman M. (eds), CRC Press, Inc., s. 303-317, 1988.
22.
Satorre E.H., Snaydon R.W.: A comparison of root and shoot competition between spring cereals and Avena fatua L. Weed Res., 32, s. 45-55, 1992.
23.
Seavers G. P., Wright K. J.: Crop canopy development and structure influence weed supression. Weed Res., 39, s. 319-328, 1999.
24.
Wicks G.A., Ramsel R. E., Nordquist P.T., Smith J.W., Challaiah R.E.: Impact of wheat cultivars on establishment and suppression of summer annual weeds. Agron. J., 78, s. 59-62, 1986.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2719-423X |
| ISSN: | 1642-686X |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
