Current issue
Online First
Archive
Instructions for Authors
About the Journal
Contact
3/2008 vol. 53
Stats
CC-BY 4.0
Get citation
ORIGINAL PAPER
Response of carrots to application of natural extracts from seaweed (sargassum sp.) - algaminoplant and from leonardite - humiplant
A. Dobrzański
,
 
Z. Anyszka
,
 
K. Elkner
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
 
Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2008;53(3):53-58
 
Article (PDF)
References (26)
 
KEYWORDS
carrot
seaweed
seeds
extract
 
ABSTRACT
The aim of the 2 years (2006-2007) experiments carried out with carrots was to determine the influence of biostimulators from seaweed (AlgaminoPlant) and leonardite (HumiPlant) on growth and yield of the crops. Two systems of application were compared. In the first HumiPlant (30 Lźha-1) was used directly after sowing and 0,5 Lźha-1at 1-2 leaves stage of carrots, afterwards AlgaminoPlant was applied four times (1 Lźha-1) in 7-14 days intervals. In the second system AlgaminoPlant was applied four times at the rate of 1 Lźha-1 for each treatment. Tendency of the yield increasing and positive changes in chemical composition after both treatments were observed. The content of nitrates was decreased and carotenoids were slightly increased. Soaking carrot and parsley seeds in 2% AlgaminoPlant water solution accelerated germination and improved germinability of seeds.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Aitken .B., Acock B., Senn T.L.: The characteristics and effect of humic acids derived from leonardite. S. Carolina Agric.Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. 10015 p. 28, 1964.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Blunden G.: Agricultural uses of seaweeds and seaweeds product. In.: European seaweed resources uses and potential (Giury M.D. and Blunden G. eds.), s. 65-81, John Willey & Sons, Chichester, 1991.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Bryan H.H.: Accelerating germination and growth of vegetables with pregerminated seeds subsequentially applied biostimulants. Acta Hort. (ISHS), 122: 27-28, 1981.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Dudley J.B., Pertuit A.J., Toler J.E.: Leonardite influences zinnia and marigold. HortScience, vol. 39, no. 2, s. 251-255, 2004.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Duczmal K.: 9.4/ Laboratoryjna ocena materiału siewnego. [W:] Nasiennictwo T. 1. s. 307-323. PWRiL, Poznań 2000.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Dobrzański A., Anyszka Z., Pałczyński J., Elkner K.: Zależność pomiędzy ochroną przed chwastami a plonem i zawartością azotanów w roślinach warzywnych. Progress in Plant Protection / Postępy w Ochronie Roślin, vol. 44, no 1 s. 362-462, 2004.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Dobrzański A., Anyszka Z. Response of onions and carrots to the biostimulator Asahi SL applied with herbicides. Warsaw, 7-8 February. p. 38, 2008.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Ece A., Saltali K., Erygid N., Uysal F.: The effects of leonardite applications on climbing bean (Faseolus vulgaris L) yield and some soil properties. Journal of Agronomy, vol. 6 (3) s. 480-483, 2007.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Gawlik A., Gołębiowska D.: The influence of humic acid on growth of "Ramrod" pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants. Book of abstracts: Biostimulators in modern agriculture. Warsaw, 7-8 February. p. 108, 2008.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Joubert J.M., Lefranc G.: Seaweed phytostimulants in agriculture: recent studies on mode of action two types of products from algae: growth and nutrition stimulants and stimulants of plant defence reactions. Book of abstracts: Biostimulators in modern agriculture. Warsaw, 7-8 February, p. 16, 2008.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Kowaliński S.: Substancje organiczne gleby. W.: Gleboznawstwo (red. B. Dobrzański, S. Zawadzki). s. 228-242. PWRiL, Warszawa 1981.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Lee B. Seaweed potential as marine vegetable and other opportunities. Australian Government Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. RIRDC publication no. 09. 009, 2008.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Matysiak K. 1.3.4. Kelpak - naturalny regulator wzrostu i rozwoju roślin. [W:] Wybrane zagadnienia ekologiczne we współczesnym rolnictwie. Monografia, T. 2 (red. Z. Zbytek). PIMR, Poznań 2005, s. 188-192.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Matysiak K., Kaczmarek S., Adamczewski K.: Benefits of using Kelpak bioregulator in various crops. Book of abstracts: Biostimulators in modern agriculture. Warsaw, 7-8 February, p. 64, 2008.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Mayhew L.: Humic substances in biological agriculture. www.acresusa.com/toolbox/reprints/June04_humi% substances.pdf2004.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Nowosielski O.: Nawożenie roślin wyłącznie naturalnym preparatem mikrobiologicznym z aktywną próchnicą. Zeszyty Naukowe WSE-H w Skierniewicach. Z. 7, w druku 2007.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Pałczyński J., Dobrzański A.: Wpływ stymulatora Kelpak na niektóre cechy morfologiczne pomidora. Progress in Plant Protection / Postępy w Ochronie Roślin, vol. 44, nr 2, s. 580-583, 2004.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Rozporządzenie Rady WE nr 2092/91.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Saint Henis A.: Guide practique de culture biologique methode Lamaire-Boucher. Agriculture Et Vie, France, 1972.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Sivasankari S., Venkatesalu. V., Anantharaj M., Chandrasekaran M.: Effect of seaweed extracts on the growth and biochemical constants of Vigna sinensis. Bioresource Technology vol. 97 (14) s. 1745-751, 2006.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Stępowska A.: Biostimulators for sweet pepper under cover. Book of abstracts: Biostimulators in modern agriculture. Warsaw 7-8 February, p. 36, 2008.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Tylkowska K., Dorna H.: 7.5. Inne metody uszlachetniania materiału siewnego. W: Nasiennictwo T. 1. s. 265-273. PWRiL, Poznań 2000.
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Verkleij F.N. Sea weed extracts in agriculture and horticulture. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture. vol. 8, s. 309-324, 1992.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Wykaz nawozów i środków poprawiających właściwości gleby zakwalifikowanych do stosowania w rolnictwie ekologicznym. www.iung.pulawy.pl/odpady/wykaz.htm.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Wysocka-Owczarek M. Humusy i biopreparaty. Owoce, Warzywa , Kwiaty. 11. s. 7, 1997.
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Zimmer G.: Humates & humic substances bio-correct inputs for the eco - farmer. ACRES vol. 34, No 1. www.acesusa.com/toolbox/reprints/Jan04_04humates.p df. 2004.
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
RELATED ARTICLE
The consequent influence of selected biopreparations used in spice crops on the content of biologically active compounds in the seeds
Usage of biopreparations as seed dressings in legume cultivation
Effect of conditioning on dill (Anethum graveolens L.) seed germination and plant emergence
Wpływ wodnych wyciągów ze zmielonych nasion agrostemma githago na kiełkowanie ozimych form pszenicy i jęczmienia
Effectivity of semi-dry seeds dressing method with ecological plant protection agent
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:2719-423X
ISSN:1642-686X
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2025 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top