ORIGINAL PAPER
Relative feed value of sward from permanent dry meadow before and after renovation at different fertilisation
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Instytut Technologiczno-Przyrodniczy w Falentach, Zakład Użytków Zielonych al. Hrabska 3, Falenty, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland
 
 
Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2017;62(4):13-17
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
It is possible to obtain much wholesome bulk fodder that meets the requirements of highly productive animals from permanent grasslands of appropriate species composition. Important components of such fodder are: neutral detergent fibres (NDF) and acid detergent fibres (ADF). Based on their content one may calculate digestibility of dry mass (DDM), dry mass intake (DMI) and relative feed value (RFV). Presented studies were performed in the years 2009-2014 on five plots in a long-term experiment situated on a permanent dry ground meadow, that belonged to the Experimental Farm of the ITP in Falenty. In spring 2012 the meadow was renovated through undersowing. Mean values of analysed parameters were similar and more distinct differences were found between cuts and subsequent study years. Mean NDF content ranged between 501 and 567 g kg-1 while ADF content - between 265 and 325 g kg-1. Digestibility of analysed sward was lower than optimum and amounted from 60.1 do 63.6 % dry mass. Intake was assessed at 2.12 to 2.48%. Mean values of RFV were in the range of 100 to 120 which placed the fodder in the third and fourth quality class according to Linn and Martin [8].
REFERENCES (15)
1.
Baert J., Van Waes C.: Improvement of the digestibility of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) inspired by perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenneL.). The Future of European Grasslands. Grassl. Sci. Europe, 2014, 19: 172-174.
 
2.
Belanger G., Virkajarvi P., Duru M., Tremblay G.F. Saarijarvi K. Herbage nutritive in less-favoured areas of cool regions. The Role of Grasslands in a Green Future. Grassl. Sci. Europe, 2013, 18: 57-70.
 
3.
Brzóska F., Śliwiński B.: Jakość pasz objętościowych w żywieniu przeżuwaczy i metody jej oceny. Cz.II. Metody analizy i oceny wartości pokarmowej pasz objętościowych.Wiad. Zoot., 2011, 4: 57-68.
 
4.
Dymnicka M.: Węglowodany. [W:] Podstawy żywienia zwierząt. Pod red. M. Damnickiej i J. Sokoła. Wyd. SGGW, Warszawa, 2001: 15-19.
 
5.
Grzelak M., Bocian T.: Wartość pokarmowa zielonki i siana z łąk ekologicznych. Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering, 2009, Vol. 54(3): 86-90.
 
6.
Jankowska-Huflejt H., Wróbel B.: Ocena przydatności pasz z użytków zielonych do produkcji zwierzęcej w badanych gospodarstwach ekologicznych. Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering, 2008, Vol. 53(3): 103-108.
 
7.
Kotlarz A., Stankiewicz S., Biel W.: Skład botaniczny i chemiczny siana z półnaturalnej łąki oraz jego wartość pokarmowa dla koni. Acta Sci. Pol. Zootechnica, 2010, 9 (4): 119-128.
 
8.
Linn J.G., Martin N.P.: Forage quality test and interpretation. Minnesota Extension Service. University of Minnesota, 1989: 1-5.
 
9.
Preś J.: Produkcja pasz zielonych a potrzeby intensywnego żywienia zwierząt. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol., 1977, 194: 121-132.
 
10.
Rodrigues A.M., Andueza D., Picard F., Cecato U., Farruggia A., Daumont R.: Classification of mountain permanent grasslands based on their feed value. Biodiversity and animal feed. EGF, Grassland Sciences in Europe, 2008, 13: 501-503.
 
11.
Sosnowski J., Jankowski K.: Względna wartość pokarmowa mieszanek festulolium brauni z lucerna mieszańcową uprawianych w warunkach zróżnicowanego nawożenia azotem. Folia Pomer. Univ. Technol. Stetin, Agric., Aliment., Pisc., Zootech., 2013, 307 (28): 99-106.
 
12.
Stejskalova M., Hejcmanova P., Hejcman M.: Forage value of leaf fodder main European broad-leaved woody species. The role of grassland in a green future. Grassl. Sci. Europe, 2013, 18: 85-87.
 
13.
Tomic Z., Bielic Z., Zujovic M., Simac A., Kresowic M., Mandic V., Stanisic N.: The effect of nitrogen fertilization on quality and yield of grass - legume mixtures. Grassland - a European Resource? EGF, Grassland Sciences in Europe, 2012, 17: 187-189.
 
14.
Mendra M., Barszczewski J.: Improving the status of degraded irrigated meadow by direct undersowing. Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering, 2016, Vol. 61(4): 52-57.
 
15.
Jankowska-Huflejt H.: The need of protecting permanent grasslands as a premise for the development of organic meadow farms. Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering, 2016, Vol. 61(3): 186-192.
 
eISSN:2719-423X
ISSN:1642-686X
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top