ORIGINAL PAPER
Response of carrot (Daucus carota L.), to strip tillage and injection of liquid swine manure into plant row
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Agronomy, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland
2
Industrial Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Poznań, Poland
Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2016;61(4):116-119
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Field study was conducted between 2011 and 2012 to determine the effects of liquid manure injected into plant row just before planting carrot in strip tillage. Strip tillage machine consisted of four units attached to frame. Every unit included shank, covering discs and rolling basket. The applicator consisted of a plastic tank mounted on the top of frame, valve, delivery hoses and injection tubes installed just after shanks. Average tillage depth was 20 cm and injection one: 10 cm. Strip tillage was compared with mouldboard ploughing. The new technology was safe for carrot plants. Plant emergence and root quality were not affected by injection of swine manure into plant row. Yield of roots obtained after mineral and organic fertilization was similar. Results of the study show, that injection of liquid swine manure in strip tillage is possible in carrot production, but further studies are needed to optimize technology.
REFERENCES (12)
1.
Błażewicz-Woźniak M.: Zmiany kształtu korzeni pietruszki pod wpływem uprawy zerowej i mulczów roślinnych. Acta Agrophysica, 2003, 2(3), 489-497.
2.
Błażewicz-Woźniak M., Wach D., Konopiński M., Patkowska E., Bałtyn M.: Effect of cover crops on emergence and growth of carrot (Daucus carota L.) in no-plow and traditional tillage. Acta Agrobot., 2015, 68(1), 63-73.
3.
Brainard D., Corey Noyes D.: Strip tillage and compost influence carrot quality, yield and net returns. HortScience, 2012, 47(8), 1073-1079.
4.
Coelho B., Roy R., Bruin A., White P.: Zonejection: conservation tillage manure nutrient delivery system. Agron. J. 2009, 101, 215-225.
5.
Hendrix B.J., Young B. G., Chong S.: Weed management in strip tillage corn. Agron. J., 2004, 96, 229-235.
6.
Huijsmans J., Verwijs B., Rodhe L., Smith K.: Costs of emission-reducing manure application. Bioresource Technology, 2004, 93, 11-19.
7.
Loecke T., Liebman M., Cambardella C., Richard T.: Corn response to composting and time of application of solid swine manure. Agron. J., 2004, 96, 214-223.
8.
Majchrzak L. Skrzypczak G., Pudełko J.: Wpływ uproszczeń w uprawie roli na plonowanie kukurydzy. Cz.I uprawa kukurydzy w plonie głównym. PTPN, Prace Komisji Nauk Rolniczych i Komisji Nauk Leśnych, 2002, 93, 39-51.
9.
Morris N., Miller P., Orson J., Froud-Williams R.: The adoption of non-inversion tillage systems in the United Kingdom and the agronomic impact on soil, crops and the environment - A review. Soil Till. Res., 2010, 108, 1-15.
10.
Piechota T.: Reakcja kukurydzy na pasową uprawę roli w warunkach niedoborów wody. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln., 2011, 559, 153-160.
11.
Piechota T., Kowalski M., Sawinska Z., Majchrzak L.: Ocena przydatności pasowej uprawy roli do doglebowej aplikacji płynnych nawozów organicznych w uprawie kukurydzy. Fragm. Agron., 2014, 31(1), 74-82.
12.
Piechota T., Zbytek Z., Kowalski M., Dach J.: Wpływ pasowej uprawy roli i mechanicznego zwalczania chwastów na fizyczne właściwości gleby w uprawie kukurydzy w plonie wtórym. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng., 2013, 4, 104-108.