Current issue
Online First
Archive
Instructions for Authors
About the Journal
Contact
2/2016 vol. 61
Stats
CC-BY 4.0
Get citation
ORIGINAL PAPER
Selection and hierarchization of the ahp method based decision process criteria for the choice of battery for power driven agricultural machines
A. Osuch 1
,
 
P. Rybacki 1
,
 
E. Osuch 1
,
 
Z. Dworecki 1
,
 
N. Mioduszewska 1
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu, Instytut Inżynierii Biosystemów, ul. Wojska Polskiego 50, 60-627 Poznań, Poland
 
 
Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2016;61(2):74-77
 
Article (PDF)
References (28)
 
KEYWORDS
battery
decision process
AHP method
 
ABSTRACT
The lead-acid batteries are used in every power driven agricultural machines. Despite numerous faults (especially connected to the environmental protection aspects), the batteries have one basic advantage, i.e. low price. Their life is increasingly short and sometimes they require replacement after only 2-3 years of use. The correct exploitation of the battery depends mainly on the proper selection of wiring system units applied in an agricultural machine. The decision process related to the purchase of a proper battery is one of the most difficult and assumes most responsibility in terms of agricultural machines maintenance. The faulty selection of a battery may result in the necessity of an earlier replacement or even in the damage of numerous electric and mechanical units applied in an agricultural machine. Every waste battery is a threat to the natural environment and is classified as a hazardous waste. The study is devoted to the selection and hierarchization of the criteria for the decision process taking place in the case of an agricultural machine battery purchase.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Ayag Z.: A hybrid approach to machine-tool selection through AHP and simulation. International Journal of Production Research, 2007, 45(9), 2029-2050.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Bana e Costa C. A., Vansnick F.C.: Sur la quantification des jugements de valeur. L’approche MACBETH, Cahiers du LAMSADE. Université Paris-Dauphine, 1999, 117.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Brans J.P.: L’ingénierie de la décision: Elaboration d’instruments d’aide à la décision. La méthode PROMETHEE. In: Nadeau R., Landry M. (ed.). L’aide à la décision: Nature Instruments et Perspectives d’Avenir. Presses de l’Université Laval, Québec, 1982.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Churchman C.W., Ackoff. R.L.: An approximate measure of value. Journal of Operations Research Society of America, 1954, 2 (1).
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Doloi H.: Application of AHP in improving construction productivity from a management perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 2008, 26, 839-852.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Edwards W.: Social utilities. Engineering Economics, 1971, 6.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Edwards W., Barron. F.H.: SMARTS and SMARTER: improved Simple methods for multiattribute measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 1994, 60.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Fundowicz P., Michałowski B., Radzimierski M.: Podstawy elektrotechniki i elektroniki samochodowej. Warszawa: WSiP, 2007.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Hwang C.L., Yoon K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications. A State of the Art Survey. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1984.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Kamińska E., Kamiński T., Skarbek-Żabkin. A.: Aspekt prawny recyklingu akumulatorów kwasowoołowiowych. Logistyka - nauka, 2014, 2, 115-123.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Kamińska E., Merkisz J.: The legal and environmental aspect of the automotive lead acid batteries utilisation. Archives of Waste Management and Environmental Protection, 2012, 14, 1.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Kamińska E., Skarbek-Żabkin A.: Analiza ekobilansowa recyklingu zużytych akumulatorów kwasowo-ołowiowych. Logistyka - nauka, 2014, 6, 5158-5167.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Lootsma F.A.: The REMBRANDT system for multi-criteria decision analysis via pairwise comparisons or direct rating. Faculty of Technical Mathematics and Informatics. Delft University of Technology, Delft, 1992.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Mikhailov L., Tzvetinov P.: Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 2004, 5, 23-33.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Nowak M.: Preference and veto thresholds in multicriteria analysis based on stochastic dominance. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 158, 339-350.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Osuch A., Osuch E., Rybacki P., Szulc R., Szwedziak K.: Selekcja i hierarchizacja kryteriów procesu decyzyjnego modernizacji parku maszyn gospodarstw rolnych metodą AHP. Logistyka - nauka, 2015, 5, 5188-5194.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Pszczółkowski J., Dyga G.: Funkcja napięcia akumulatora kwasowego. Logistyka - nauka, 2014, 3, 5347-5356.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Roy B., Bouyssou D.: Aide Multicritere à la Décision: Méthodes et Cas, Economica, Paris, 1993.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Rybacki R., Rzeźnik C., Durczak K.: Wykorzystanie wnioskowania rozmytego w procesie decyzyjnym zakupu ciągnika rolniczego. Inżynieria Rolnicza, 2013, 4(147), 281-290.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Saaty T.L.: Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 1986, 32(7), 841-855.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Saaty T.L.: Deriving the AHP 1-9 Scale from First Principles ISAHP: Berne - Switzerland, 2001, 397-402.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Saaty T.L.: The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Saaty T.L.: How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, 48(1), 9-26.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Saaty T.L.: Decision making with dependence and feedback. The analytic network process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1996.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Szeląg-Sikora A., Wojciech J.: Struktura obszarowa gospodarstw rolnych a wpływ poziomu wykorzystania funduszy unijnych na wyposażenie w park maszynowy. Inżynieria Rolnicza, 2007, 6(94), 247- 253.
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Tzeng G. H., Huang J. J.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Methods and Applications. CRC Press, London, 2011.
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Wijnmalen D. J. D., Wedley W.C.: Non-discriminating Criteria in the AHP: Removal and Rank Reversal. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 2009, 15, 143-149.
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Zaraś K., Martel J.M.: Multiattribute Analysis Based on Stochastic Dominance. In. B. Munier B., Machina M.J. (ed.) Models and Experiments in Risk and Rationality. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1994.
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
RELATED ARTICLE
Investigation of the decision-making process of selection of service station for agricultural tractors using the AHP method
Optymisation of the decision-making process relevant to the choice of agricultural machines using the AHP method
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:2719-423X
ISSN:1642-686X
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2025 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top