ORIGINAL PAPER
Soil abundance in Nmin and formation of maize grain yield components
 
More details
Hide details
1
Poznań University of Life Sciences, Department of Agronomy, ul. Dojazd 11, 60-632 Poznań, Poland
 
2
Poznań University of Life Sciences, Department of Gastronomical Sciences and Functional Foods, ul. Wojska Polskiego 31, 60-624, Poznań, Poland
 
 
Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2020;65(1):39-43
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The study presents the results of 3-year field experiments aimed at assessing the effect of nitrogen dose balanced on the basis of Nmin content, depending on the distribution in the soil profile and recognizing the effect of the type of nitrogen fertilizer on the formation of maize grain yield components. Nitrogen applied in the form of mineral fertilizer was characterized by greater efficiency in comparison to Nmin contained in the soil, as evidenced by a significantly higher grain number in the ear and 1000 grain weight. It was shown that mineral nitrogen (Nmin) present in soil in maize rooting zone significantly influenced the number of production ears per area unit. Inclusion of the pool of the component contained in the soil in the algorithm for calculating nitrogen dose significantly improves the quantitative status of the ears. It is sufficient to collect soil samples from two levels, i.e., 0-30 cm and 0-60 cm, to determine nitrogen dose based on the soil abundance in mineral nitrogen (Nmin).
REFERENCES (12)
1.
Andraski T., Bundy G.L., Brye K.R.: Crop management and corn nitrogen rate effects on nitrate leaching. Journal Environmental Quality, 2000, 29, 1095-1103.
 
2.
Asibi A.E., Chai Q., Coulter J.A.: Mechanisms of nitrogen use in maize. Agronomy, 2019, 9, 775.
 
3.
Bänziger M., Edmeades G.O., Lafitte H.R.: Physiological mechanisms contributing to the increased N stress tolerance of tropical maize selected for drought tolerance. Field Crops Research, 2002, 75, 223-233.
 
4.
Borowiecki J., Koter Z.: Porównanie saletry amonowej i mocznika jako źródła azotu dla kukurydzy. Pamiętnik Puławski, 1983, 81, 77-88.
 
5.
Evans L.T.: The physiological basis of crop yield. pp. 327- 355. In: Crop Physiology: Some case histories. Ed. Evans, L.T., Cambridge University Press, London 1975.
 
6.
Scharf P.C., William J., Wiebold J., Lory J.A.: Corn yield response to nitrogen fertilizer timing and deficiency level. Agronomy Journal, 2002, 94, 435-441.
 
7.
Szulc P., Skrzypczak W., Waligóra H.: Improvement of the effectiveness of maize (Zea mays L.) fertilization with nitrogen by the application of magnesium. Part. I. Grain yield and its structure. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Agricultura, 2008, 7(4), 125-135.
 
8.
Szulc P.: Differences in the accumulation and redistribution of dry matter and Nmin content in the cultivation of two different maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars for grain. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2012, 21(4), 1039-1046.
 
9.
Szulc P., Bocianowski J., Rybus-Zając M.: Response of nitrogen nutritional indices maize leaves to different mineralorganic fertilization. Maydica, 2012, 57, 260-265.
 
10.
Szulc P., Bocianowski J.: Monitoring of biogenic elements concentrations in drainage water of the production field. Bulgarian Journal Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 19(3), 472-478.
 
11.
Viet B., Schmidt R., Hake S., Yanofsky M.: Maize flora development: New genes and old mutants. The Plant Cell, 1993, 5, 1205-1215.
 
12.
Zeidan M.S., Amany A., Bahr El-Kramany M.F.: Effect of Nfertilizer and plant density on yield and quality of maize in sandy soil. Research Journal and Biological Sciences, 2006, 2(4), 156-161.
 
eISSN:2719-423X
ISSN:1642-686X
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top