ORIGINAL PAPER
The comparison of competitive ability against weeds of 10 varieties of rye cultivated in organic system
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation - State Research Institute, ul. Czartoryskich 8, 24-100 Puławy, Poland
 
 
Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2014;59(3):35-40
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
In the study 9 varieties of winter rye: Bosmo, Dańkowskie Amber, Dańkowskie Diament, Dańkowskie Złote, Daran, Kier, Rostockie, Stanko, Walet and one summer and winter sown variety - Bojko cultivated in organic system were compared. The research was conducted in 2012-2013 in two different locations: Grabów (Masovian voivodeiship) and Taraskowo (Podlasie voivodeship). The number of weeds and their dry matter were analyzed in two growing stages of rye: tillering and dough stage. Moreover the analysis of height, number of tillers and yielding of rye varieties were done. In dough stage number of weeds was big, 235 pcs∙m-2 on average, but their dry matter was on the level of 55 g∙m-2 on average. Rye varieties did not differ significantly due to the number of weeds, based on means from 2 years and locations, except of Bojko. Different reactions of rye varieties in relation to weeds in locations were observed. The most competitive varieties according to dry matter of weeds in dough stage were in Grabów: Dańkowskie Złote, Daran and Walet, and in Taraskowo: Bosmo, Dańkowskie Diament and Rostockie. There were no significant correlations between the level of infestation and morphological features of rye varieties: height and tillering. The observed level of weed infestation did not significantly affect grain yield of tested rye varieties.
REFERENCES (20)
1.
GUS. Rocznik Statystyczny Rolnictwa. Główny Urząd Statystyczny 2012 (http://www.stat.gov.pl/).
 
2.
Barnes J.P., Putnam A.R.: Evidence of allelopathy by residues and aqueous extracts of rye. Weed Sci., 1986, 34 (3), 384-390.
 
3.
Finney D. M., Creamer N. G.: Weed Management on Organic Farms. The Organic Production Publication Series, CEFS, 2008, 1-34.
 
4.
Kraska P., Pałys E.: Zachwaszczenie łanu żyta ozimego w zależności od zróżnicowanych poziomów agrotechniki. Acta Agrophysica 2007, 10(2), 397-405.
 
5.
Eisele J.-A., Köpke U. Choice of cultivars in organic farming: New criteria for winter wheat ideotypes. Pflanzenbauwissenschaften, 1997, 1, 19-24.
 
6.
Seavers G.P., Wright K.J.: Crop canopy development and structure influence weed suppression. Weed Res., 1999, 39, 319-328.
 
7.
Księżak J., Staniak M.: Effect of root excretions from spring cereal seedlings on legume seeds germination. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 2011, 9 (3,4), 412-415.
 
8.
Satorre E.H., Snaydon R.W.: A comparison of root and shoot competition between spring cereals and Avena fatua L.. Weed Research, 1992, 32(1), 45-55.
 
9.
Feledyn-Szewczyk B.: Porównanie konkurencyjności współczesnych i dawnych odmian pszenicy ozimej w stosunku do chwastów. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Engng, 2009, 54 (3), 60-67.
 
10.
Hoad S., Topp C., Davies K.: Selection of cereals for weed suppression in organic agriculture: a method based on cultivar sensitivity to weed growth. Euphytica, 2008, 163(3), 355-366.
 
11.
Kolb L.N., Gallandt E.R.: Weed management in organic ce-reals: advances and opportunities. Organic Agriculture, 2012, 2(1), 23-42.
 
12.
Bertholdsson N-O.: Early vigour and allelopathy - two useful traits for enhanced barley and wheat competitiveness against weeds. Weed Res., 2005, 45, 94-102.
 
13.
Lemerle D., Verbeek B., Orchard B.: Ranking the ability of wheat varieties to compete with Lolium rigidum. Weed Res., 2001, 41, 197-209.
 
14.
Worthington M., Reberg-Horton C.: Breeding Cereal Crops for Enhanced Weed Suppression: Optimizing Allelopathy and Competitive Ability. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2013, 39 (2), 213-231.
 
15.
Rezmerska-Piętka J., Łęgowiak Z., Radecki A.: Wpływ wieloletniego nawożenia mineralnego i organicznego na biologię dominujących chwastów w monokulturze żyta. Ann. UMCS, sec. E, 2007, 62 (2), 119-116.
 
16.
Blecharczyk A., Małecka I., Sawińska Z., Zawada D.: Wpływ nawożenia na bioróżnorodność chwastów w wieloletniej monokulturze żyta ozimego. Progress in Plant Protection, 2009, 49 (1), 322-325.
 
17.
Sadowski T., Rychcik B.: Porównanie efektów chemicznej i mechanicznej regulacji zachwaszczenia żyta ozimego. Prog. Plant Prot./Post. Ochr. Roślin, 2007, 47(3), 254-257.
 
18.
Feledyn-Szewczyk B. The influence of morphological fea-tures of spelt wheat (Triticum aestivum ssp. spelta) and common wheat (Triticum aestivum ssp. vulgare) varieties on the competitiveness against weeds in organic farming system. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 2013, Vol. 11(1), 416-421.
 
19.
Feledyn-Szewczyk B.: Zachwaszczenie odmian pszenicy jarej uprawianej w ekologicznym systemie produkcji. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Engng, 2011, 56(3), 71-76.
 
20.
Kapeluszny J.: Kształtowanie się struktury plonu i łanu jęczmienia jarego i jarej pszenicy w zależności od stopnia zachwaszczenia. XVII Krajowa Konferencja "Przyczyny i źródła zachwaszczenia pól uprawnych". Olsztyn-Bęsia, Wyd. ART, 1994, 95-100.
 
eISSN:2719-423X
ISSN:1642-686X
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top