ORIGINAL PAPER
The effect of milking systems on the quantity and quality of cow milk
More details
Hide details
1
Instytut Technologiczno-Przyrodniczy, Oddział w Poznaniu ul. Biskupińska 67, 60-463 Poznań, Poland
2
Lely East Sp. z o.o. Lisi Ogon, ul. Pocztowa 2a, 86-065 Łochowo, Poland
3
Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu, Katedra Genetyki i Podstaw Hodowli Zwierząt ul. Wołyńska 33, 60-637 Poznań, Poland
Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2017;62(4):193-196
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The subject of the study refers to the effect of housing and milking systems on yield, chemical composition, and cytological quality of milk from primiparous cows held in two barns belonging to the same owner where cows were fed using the same feed. Cows from barn C were kept in deep litter and milked in a fishbone milking parlour, whereas cows from barn M were kept in box stalls with litter bedding and milked using milking robots manufactured by Lely. Data on 305-day lactation was collected from 82 cows in barn C and 246 primiparous cows in barn M. Primiparous cows from barn M showed better yields and better cytological quality of milk. Milk yield obtained during lactation in barn C was equal to 8,108 kg and in barn M - to 9,175 kg. Differences in kg milk yield, fat yield, and protein yield were statistically highly significant in favour of the herd in barn M. The percentage of milk samples with a somatic cell count (SCC) exceeding 400,000 per 1 ml was 10.5% for barn C and 2.5% for barn M. Percentage of milk samples of the highest quality, with an SCC lower than 100,000, was higher in barn M.
REFERENCES (17)
1.
Brade E., Brade W.: Milchharnstoff als Indikator nutzen. Neue Landwirtschaft, 2010, 5, 67-68.
2.
Doleżal O., Bilek M., Cerna D., Dolejs J.: Komforni ustajeni vysokoprodukcnich dojnic. Vezkumny ustaw żyvocisne vyroby v Uhrinevsi, 2002.
3.
Kanswohl N., Burdstaler J., Herold J., Sanftleben P.: Oefter melken? Viermaliges Melken beeinflustt Tierverhalten unguenstig. Neue Landwirtschaft, 2008, 8, 62-64.
4.
Klungel G.H., Slaghuis B.A., Hogeveen H.: The effect of the introduction of automatic milking systems on milk quality. J. Dairy Sci., 2000, 80:427-436.
5.
Kruip T.A, Morice M.H., Robert M., Ouweltjes W.: Robotic milking and its effect on fertility and cell counts. J. Dairy Sci., 2002, 85, 2576-2581.
6.
Leopold S.: Viermal melken. Noch einen Gang hochschalten? Neue Landwirtschaft, 2010, 6, 66.
7.
Malinowski E., Kłossowska A.: Diagnostyka zakażeń i zapaleń wymienia. Państwowy Instytut Weterynaryjny, Puławy, 2002.
8.
Morel I., Collomb U., Dorland A., Bruckmaier R.: Einfluss eines Energiedefizits auf die Zusammensetzung der Milch. Agraforschung Schweiz, 2010, 1(2), 66-73.
9.
National Mastitis Council (NMC). 2006, NMC recomended mastitis control program.
http://www.nmconline.org/ docs/NMCchoecklistInt.pdf.
10.
Philpot W.N., Nickerson S.C.: Zwyciężyć w walce z mastitis, Wyd. WestfaliaSurge Polska Sp. z o.o., 2006.
11.
Peters-Sengers R.: Automatic milking systems as a risk factor for intramammary infections caused by environmental pathogens. J. Dairy Sci., 2014, 93(9), 4019-4033.
12.
Scheleitzer G.: Erlaichterung fuer die Kuh, Stress fuer den Melker? Neue Landwirtschaft, 2005, 60-64.
13.
Svennersten-Sjaunja K.M., Petersson G.: Pros and cons of automatic milking in Europe. J. Anim. Sci., 2008, 86 supl. 1, 37-46.
14.
Wolf J., Jahnke B.: Mehr Aufwandt-hoehere Leistung. Neue Landwirtschaft, 1998, 10, 60-63.
15.
Wyniki prac hodowlanych w roku 2016. Polska Federacja Hodowców Bydła i Producentów Mleka, Warszawa, 2017.
16.
Veanthier G.: Das Management ist noch wichtiger als beim Melkstand. Top Agrar, 1999, 2, 16-21.
17.
Ziemiński R., Juszczak J.: Zawartość mocznika w mleku, jako wskaźnik stosunku białkowo-energetycznego w dawce pokarmowej dla krów mlecznych. Postępy Nauk Rolniczych 1997, 3, 73-82.