ORIGINAL PAPER
The influence of seed dressings and effective microorganisms on the development and health status of selected species of cereals
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Plant Protection - National Research Institute ul. Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland
 
 
Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2017;62(3):178-182
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The aim of the study was to assess how synthetic seed dressings, effective microorganisms (EM) and the combination of both influenced the development and the health status of wheat, barley and rye at early phases of their growth. The following seed dressings were used in a greenhouse experiment: EM MG, Astep 225 FS, Baytan Trio 180 FS and Vibrance Gold 100 FS. They were applied individually and in combination with EM MG. The emergence of plants, the percentage of plants with blight symptoms, the fresh and dry weight as well as the length of the aerial part and roots were assessed at the phase of 9 leaves (BBCH 19). There were significant differences in the number of infested winter wheat and winter barley plants between the combinations with seed treated seeds and the control variant. The greatest increase in the fresh and dry weight as well as the length of the aerial part of winter wheat and winter barley plants was observed when their seeds were dressed with Astep 225 FS, Baytan Trio 180 FS and Baytan Trio 180 FS with EM MG.
REFERENCES (14)
1.
Bergen A., Davanlou M.: Biological control of common bunt (Tilletia tritici) in organic agriculture. J. of Crop Production, 2000, 3, 157-171.
 
2.
Boligłowa E., Gleń K.: Assessment of effective microorganism activity (EM) in winter wheat protection against fungal diseases. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering, 2008, 15(1-2), 23-27.
 
3.
Boller E.F., Avilla J., Jörg E., Malavolta C., Wijnands F., Esbjerg P.: Integrated Production: Principles and Technical Guidelines. 3rd edition. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 2004, 27 (2).
 
4.
Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the framework of the Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides.
 
5.
Higa T.: Effective Microorganisms, concept and recent advances in technology. Proceedings of the Conference on Effective Microorganisms for a sustainable agriculture and environment. 4th International Conference on Kyusei Nature Farming, Bellingham-Washington USA, 1998, 247-248.
 
6.
Higa T.: Rewolucja w ochronie naszej planety. Wyd. Fundacja Rozwój SGGW, Warszawa, 2003.
 
7.
http://www.emgreen.pl/produkt/... [accessed on 13 June 2017].
 
8.
Hu Ch., Qi Y.: Long-term effective microorganisms application promote growth and increase yields and nutrition of wheat in China. Eur. J. of Agronomy, 2013, 26, 63-67.
 
9.
Piskier T.: Reakcja pszenicy jarej na stosowanie biostymulatorów i absorbentów glebowych. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Engng, 2006, 51(2), 136-138.
 
10.
Regulation of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development of 18 April 2013 concerning the requirements of IPM.
 
11.
Stępień A., Adamiak E.: Efektywne mikroorganizmy (EM-1) i ich wpływ na występowanie chorób zbóż. Prog. In Plant Protection/ Post. Ochr. Roślin, 2009, 49(4): 2027-2030.
 
12.
Tette J.P.: New York State Integrated Pest Management Program. New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets, Cornell University and Cornell Cooperative Extension. 1997.
 
13.
Olejarski P. (ed.). Zalecenia Instytutu Ochrony Roślin na lata 2016-2017. 2016.
 
14.
Valarini P.J., Alvarez M.C.D., Gasco F., Tokeshi H.: Assessment of soil properties by organic master and EM - microorganisms incorporation. R. Bras. Ci. Solo. 2003, 27, 519-525.
 
eISSN:2719-423X
ISSN:1642-686X
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top