ORIGINAL PAPER
Impact of addition of organic additives and EM-A preparation on physical, chemical and structural state of the arable-humus soil horizon. Part I. Physical and water properties
More details
Hide details
1
Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu Katedra Gleboznawstwa i Ochrony Gruntów ul. Szydłowska 50, 60-656 Poznań
Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2013;58(3):240-243
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The paper presents results of investigations whose aim was to determine the influence of different doses of farmyard manure,
straw as well as EM-A microbiological vaccine on some selected physical and water properties of the arable-humic
horizon of mineral soil. The experiment was established in controlled laboratory conditions. Combinations with two doses
of farmyard manure and straw were investigated. Moreover, a combination with an additional microbiological vaccine application
of effective microorganisms (EM) was also tested. The following properties were determined in the examined soil
samples: texture, solid phase density, natural and hygroscopic moisture content, maximal hygroscopic capacity, soil density,
porosity, filtration coefficient, water capacities at definite potentials of its binding by soil. It was found, among others
that the solid phase density was modified only by the quantity and quality of the applied organic matter additives. Volumetric
density was the lowest in the initial material and the addition of EM-A enhanced its value. The highest total porosity was
obtained in the zero sample and the addition of EM-A reduced its value. In all the remaining combinations, the application
of effective microorganisms deteriorated water-air conditions of the soil. Values of the filtration coefficient declined together
with the increase in the proportions of organic matter and the addition of EM-A in individual combinations was
found to reduce filtration velocity. Runs of water desorption curves depended very distinctly on the applied doses of farmyard
manure and straw. The addition of EM-A preparation failed to affect this soil property. In the light of the obtained research
results, its application in similar combinations appears to be not very effective or completely unjustified.
REFERENCES (20)
1.
Albiach R., Canet R., Pomares F., Ingelmo F.: Organic mater components and aggregate stability after the application of different amendments to a horticultural soil. Bioresource Technology, 2001, 76, 125-129.
2.
Al Taweil H. I., Bin Osman M, Hamid A. A., Yousoff W. M.: Development of microbial inoculants and the impact of soil application on rice seedlings growth. Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sc., 2009, 4, 79-82.
3.
Condor A. F., Perez P. G., Lokore Ch.: Effective microorganisms. Myths or reality. Rev. Peru. Biol., 2009, 315-320, http//sisbib.unmsm.edu.pe.
4.
Cosentino D., Chenu C., Bissonnais Y.L.: Aggregate stability and microbial community dynamics under drying-wetting cycles in a silt loam soil. Soil.& Biolchem., 2006, 38, 2053-2062.
5.
Denef K., Six J., Merckx R., Paustian K.: Short- term effects of biological and physical forces on aggregate formation in soil with different clay mineralogy. Plant and Soil, 2002, 246, 185-200.
6.
Gonet S.S. Mazurkiewicz M. (praca zbiorowa): Rola materii organicznej w środowisku. Pol. Tow. Subst. Hum. Wrocław, 2007, 152 ss.
7.
Higa T.: Rewolucja w ochronie naszej planety. Fundacja Rozwój SGGW, Warszawa, 2003.
8.
Klute A.: Water retention: Laboratory methods. In: Klute A. (Ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd edn. Agron. Monogr. 9 ASA and SSSA, Madison, Wi., 1986.
9.
Klute A., Dirksen C.: Hydraulic conducticity and difusivity: laboratory methods. In: Klute A. (Ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd edn. Agron. Monogr. 9 ASA and SSSA, Madison, Wi., 1986.
10.
Kondracki J.: Geografia regionalna Polski. PWN, 2009.
11.
Kozielska Z.: Technologia Efektywnych Mikroorganizmów. Obserwator, 2005, nr 35 (za: www.emgreen.pl).
12.
Krogulec E.: Wpływ metodyki badań na otrzymywane wartości współczynnika filtracji osadów słabo przepuszczalnych. Przegląd geologiczny, 1994, Vol. 42, 4.
13.
Mau F.P.: Fantastische Erfolge mit Effektiven Mikroorganismen In Haus und Garten, für Pflanzenwachstrum und Gesundheit. Goldmann Verlag 2002, 129 ss.
14.
Martyniuk S.: Skuteczne i nieskuteczne preparaty mikrobiologiczne stosowane w ochronie roślin oraz rzetelne i nierzetelne metody ich oceny. Post. Mikrobiol., 2011, 50, 4: 321-328.
15.
Mocek A., Drzymała S.: Geneza, analiza i klasyfikacja gleb. Wyd. UP Poznań, 2010, 418 ss.
16.
Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny: Polska Norma PN-R-04032: Gleby i utwory mineralne. Pobieranie próbek i oznaczanie składu granulometrycznego, 1998.
17.
Polskie Towarzystwo Gleboznawcze: Klasyfikacja uziarnienia gleb i gruntów mineralnych - PTG 2008. Rocz. Glebozn., 2009, 60, 2: 5-16.
18.
Polskie Towarzystwo Gleboznawcze: Systematyka gleb Polski. Rocz. Glebozn. PTG, 1989, 62, 3.
19.
Soil Conservation Service: Soil Survey laboratory methods manual. Soil Survey. Invest. Raport No. 42., U. S. Dept. Agric., Washington, DC, 1992.
20.
Zawadzki S.: Gleboznawstwo. PWN, Warszawa, 1993.