Current issue
Online First
Archive
Instructions for Authors
Guide for Authors
Peer Review Policy
Research Ethics Policy
Ghostwriting and Guest Authorship
Copyright
Open Access Policy
Plagiarism
About the Journal
Aim and Scope
Scientific Board
Publisher
Editorial Board
Indexing in Databases
Personal Data Protection
Repository Policy
Contact
ORIGINAL PAPER
The influence of flax seed organic dressing on fungus flora diversity in the soil
Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2011;56(4):198-202
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was tot assess the effect of dressing of the oil flax variety Alba seeds on the changes in composition of fungal flora in the soil( and) rhizosphere at the green maturity of flax bolls. In 2004-2005 at the Institute of Natural Fibres and Medicinal Plants in Poznan, studies were carried out on the effect of seed dressing with biological preparations such as: Polyversum (containing oospores of Pythium oligandrum), Cedomon (containing the bacteria Pseudomonas fluorescens), and EM (containing a mixture of photosynthetic bacteria, lactic acid bacteria and yeats), on fungus flora diversity in the soil. The control samples of untreated flax seeds and the seeds treated with Oxafun T 75 DS chemical seed dressing (containing carboxin and tiuram). The comparison of the results of the tests for soil fungi composition in the samples where no seed dressing was applied with the samples where biological seed dressing was used indicate that the applied seed dressing affected the fungal population in the soil. Pythium oligandrum inhibited most intensively the formation of fungal colonies. Pseudomonas bacteria had much weaker inhibition effect on the fungal growth than the chemical fungicide.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Capper A.I., Higgins K.P.: Application of Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates to wheat as potential biological control agents against take-all. Plant Pathol., 1993, 42, 560.
2.
Pierson E.A., Weller D.M.: Use of mixtures of fluorescent Pseudomonas to suppress take-all and improve the growth of wheat. Phytopathology, 1994, 84, 940.
3.
Amein T., Weber Z.: Seed treatment with strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens as potential biocontrol agents of wheat take-all. J. Plant Dis. Protect., 2002, 109, 655.
4.
Markellou E., Malathrakis N.E., Walker R., Edwards S.G., Powell A.A., Seddon B.: Characterisation of bacterial antagonists to Botrytis cinerea from the biotic environment and its importance with respect to Bacillus species and biocontrol considerations. In: Mańka M. (ed) Environmental Biotic Factors In Integrated Plant Disease Control. Proceedings of 3rd Conference of European Foundation for Plant Pathology. The Polish Phytopathological Society, Poznań, 1995, pp. 385-389.
5.
Foley M.F., Deacon J.W.: Susceptibility of Pythium spp. And other fungi to antagonism by the mycoparasite Pythium oligandrum. Soil Biol., 1986, 18, 91.
6.
Handelsman J., Stabb E.V.: Biocontrol of soilborne plant pathogens. Plant Cell, 1996, 8, 1855.
7.
Warcup J.H.: The soil plate method for isolation of fungi from soil. Nature, 1950, 166, 117.
8.
Mańka K.: Historical background to the study of fungal biotic interactions in soil. In: Mańka M. (ed) Environmental Biotic Factors In Integrated Plant Disease Control. Proceedings of 3rd Conference of European Foundation for Plant Pathology. The Polish Phytopathological Society, Poznań, 1995, pp. 21-26.
9.
Mańka K., Błońska A., Wnękowski S.: Researches on the composition of the microflora of several kinds of soils and its reaction on the development of some parasitic soil fungi. Prace Naukowe Instytutu Ochrony Roślin, 1961, 3 (2), 145.
10.
Ellis M.B. More Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes. Commonwealth Mycological Institute: Kew, Surrey, 1971, pp. 1-608.
11.
Gams W. Cephalosporium-artige Schimmelpilze (Hyphomycetes). Gustav Fischer Verlag: Jena, 1971, pp. 1-262.
12.
Gerlach W., Nirenberg H.: The Genus Fusarium – a Pictorial Atlas. Herausgegeben von der Biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft Institut für Mikrobiologie: Berlin-Dahlem, 1982, pp. 1-407.
13.
Nelson P.E., Toussoun T.A., Marasas W.F.O.: Fusarium species. An illustrated manual for identification. The Pennsylvania State University Press: University Park and London, 1983, pp. 1-193.
14.
Raper K.B., Thom C.H., Fennel D.: A manual of the Penicillia. Hafner Publishing Comp.: New York a. London, 1968, pp. 1-875.
15.
Rifai M.A.: A revision of the genus Trichoderma. Mycol Papers, 1969, 116, pp. 1-56.
16.
Sutton B.C.: The Coelomycetes. Commonwealth Mycological Institute: Kew, Surrey, 1980, pp. 1-696.
17.
Zycha H., Siepmann R.: Mucorales. Verlag von J. Cramer: Münden, 1969, pp. 1-355,.
18.
Steiger J.H.: Beyond the F test: Effect size confidence intervals and tests of close fit in the analysis of variance and contrast analysis. Psychol. Methods, 2004, 9, 164.
19.
Payne R., Murrey D., Harding S., Baird D., Soutou D., Lane P.: GenStat for Windows (7th edition) – Introduction. VSN International, Oxford, 2003, pp. 1-342.
20.
Doran J.W., Zeiss M.R.: Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality. Appl. Soil Ecol., 2000, 15, 3.
21.
Weber Z.: Occurrence of soil fungi on potato plantation. Acta Mycol., 1977, 13 (1), 125.
22.
Pląskowska E.: Investigation on health of winter wheat after different forecrops. Zesz. Nauk. AR Wrocław, 1996, 67 (300), 67.
23.
Martinez-Toledo M.V., Salmeron V., Rodelas B., Pozo C., Gonzalez-Lopez J.: Effects of the fungicide Captan on some functional groups of soil microflora. Appl. Soil Ecol., 1998, 7, 245.
24.
Smith M.D., Hartnett D.C., Rice C.W.: Effects of long-term fungicide applications on microbial properties in tallgrass prairie soil. Soil Biol. Biochem., 2000, 32, 935.
25.
Chen S.K., Edwards C.A., Subler S.: A microcosm approach for evaluating the effects of the fungicides benomyl and captan on soil ecological processes and plant growth. Appl. Soil Ecol., 2001, 18, 69.
26.
Pastucha A., Kołodziej B.: Microbial communities in the soil under forest – grown American ginseng. Acta Agrobot., 2005, 58 (2), 179.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2719-423X |
| ISSN: | 1642-686X |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
