ORIGINAL PAPER
Occurrence of terrestrial entomo- and arachnofauna in broad bean crop protected with non-chemical method
More details
Hide details
1
Uniwersytet Rolniczy w Krakowie, Katedra Ochrony Środowiska Rolniczego Al. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Kraków
Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2013;58(3):169-172
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of different non-chemical methods of broad beans protection against diseases
and pests on the occurrence of terrestrial fauna. The experiment was conducted in the years 2010 - 2012 at the Experimental
Station – Prusy, near Kraków. It was set up in three replications as randomized blocks. Fauna was trapped using
Barber’s traps. Broad beans crops were protected with Polyversum WP, Bioczos BR and Biosept 33 SL and intercropping
beans with fennel and coriander. Obtained results were compared with a standard protection method using chemical
preparations. Intercropping beans with fennel contributed to increase the number of terrestrial fauna, in particular representatives
of springtails. Coriander, as a companion plant, contributed to the increase of the Carabidae beetles presence.
Protection with the use of non-chemical preparations (Polyversum WP, Bioczos BR, Biosept 33 SL) did not affect the occurrence
of terrestrial fauna in general, as well as carabids, spiders and springtails. Protection with the use of artificially synthesized
preparations (Decis 2.5 EC, Fastac 100 EC, Penncozeb 80 WP), contributing indirectly to increase of soil covering,
increased occurrence of springtails.
REFERENCES (11)
1.
Wenda-Piesik A., Piesik D.: Skuteczność wyciągu z czosnku w ograniczeniu oprzędzików (Sitona spp.) w uprawie grochu siewnego. Progr. Plant Prot./Post. Ochr. Roślin, 2009, 49 (4), 2038-2043.
2.
Gospodarek J., Boligłowa E., Gleń K.: Porównanie niechemicznego i chemicznego sposobu ochrony bobu przed oprzędzikami (Sitona spp.). Progr. Plant Prot./Post. Ochr. Roślin, 2012, 52 (1), 26-30.
3.
Rogowska M.: Bioczos płynny w ochronie wczesnych warzyw przed szkodnikami. Progr. Plant Protect/Post. Ochr. Rośl., 2003, 43 (2), 880-883.
4.
Trenbath B.R.: Intercropping for the management of pests and diseases. Field Crops Res., 1993, 34(3-4), 381-405.
5.
Wnuk A., Wojciechwicz-Żytko E.: Effect of intercropping of broad bean (Vicia faba L.) with tansy phacelia (Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth.) on the occurrence of Aphis fabae Scop. and predatory Syrphidae. Aphids and Other Hemipterous Insects, 2007, 13, 211-217.
6.
Seidenglanz M., Huňady I., Poslušna J., Loes A.K.: Influence of intercropping with spring cereals on the occurrence of pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris, 1776) and their natural enemies in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Plant Protect. Sci., 2011, 47, 25-36.
7.
Kosewska A.: Effect of plant protection treatments on the occurrence of ground beetles (Col. Carabidae) in selected plant plantations. Progr. Plant Prot./Post. Ochr. Roślin, 2012, 52 (3), 529-534.
8.
Pruszyński S.: Ochrona roślin w różnych systemach produkcji a różnorodność biologiczna. Progr. Plant Prot./Post. Ochr. Roślin, 2009, 49 (3), 1092-1101.
9.
Hurka K.: Carabidae of the Chech and Slovak Republics. Kabourek, Zlin, 1996, 565 pp.
10.
Gospodarek J., Boligłowa E., Gleń K. Rusin M.: Jakość nasion bobu chronionego preparatami niechemicznymi. Post. Ochr. Roślin / Progr. Plant Protect., 2013 (w druku).
11.
Wiech K.: Wpływ współrzędnej uprawy późnej kapusty z koniczyną białą i fasolą szparagową na występowanie szkodliwej i pożytecznej entomofauny. Zesz. Nauk. AR Kraków, Ser. Rozprawy, 1993, 177, 74 ss.