Current issue
Online First
Archive
Instructions for Authors
About the Journal
Contact
3/2016 vol. 61
Stats
CC-BY 4.0
Get citation
ORIGINAL PAPER
Yielding of new quality varieties of winter wheat cultivated in organic farming
K. Jończyk 1
,
 
J. Stalenga 1
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Instytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, ul. Czartoryskich 8, 24-100 Puławy, Poland
 
 
Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2016;61(3):200-205
 
Article (PDF)
References (19)
 
KEYWORDS
winter wheat
varieties
organic farming
nitrogen
nutritional status
yield components
 
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to evaluate the yielding of selected quality varieties of winter wheat grown in organic farming in different regions of Poland. The field trials were performed in the years 2014-2015. The analyses included grain yield, its structure, nitrogen nutritional status and presence and intensity of fungal diseases. The results showed that, regardless of locality, Sailor, KWS Ozon and Muszelka gave the largest and the most stable yields. The mass of 1000 grains was the main factor responsible for this. Arkadia, Ostroga and spelt wheat Rokosz varieties gave the smallest yields. There was a lack of correlation between the yields and the nitrogen nutritional status of tested varieties. The results indicate the need to develop new critical nitrogen concentrations better tailored to the specifics of organic farming.
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Anderson W.K., Seymour M., D’Antuono M.F.: Evidence for differences between cultivars in responsiveness of wheat to applied nitrogen. Austrialian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1991, 42: 363-377.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Baresel J.P., Zimmermann G., Reents, H.J.: Effects of genotypes and environment on N uptake and N partition in organically grown winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Germany. Euphytica, 2008, 163: 347-354.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Cesevičienė J., Leistrumaitė A., Paplauskienė V.: Grain yield and quality of winter wheat varieties in organic agriculture. Agronomy Research, 2009, 7: 217-223.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
COBORU, Porejestrowe doświadczalnictwo odmianowe. Charakterystyka odmian. 2014. http://www.coboru.pl/DR/ charaktodmiany.aspx.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Dawson J.C., Huggins D.R., Jones S.S.: Characterizing nitrogen use efficiency in natural and agricultural ecosystems to improve the performance of cereal crops in low-input and organic agricultural systems. Field Crops Research, 2008, 107: 89-101.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Eisele J.A., Köpke U.: Choice of cultivars in organic farming: new criteria for winter wheat ideotypes. Pflanzenbauwissenschaften, 1997, 1(1): 19-24.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
EPPO: Guidelines for the efficacy evaluation of plant protection products. Standards, vol.1:187-195, 1999.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Fotyma E., Pecio A.: Zależność pomiędzy zawartością azotu a nagromadzaniem suchej masy przez zboża. Pam. Puł. 1999, 114: 93-100.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Jończyk K.: Problemy agrotechniki w rolnictwie ekologicznym. Studia i Raporty IUNG-PIB, 2010, z. 26.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Jończyk K. Reakcja wybranych odmian pszenicy ozimej na uprawę w różnych systemach produkcji roślinnej. Pam. Puł., 2012, 130/1: 339-345.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Kuś J., Jończyk K., Stalenga J, Feledyn-Szewczyk B., Mróz A.: Plonowanie wybranych odmian pszenicy ozimej w uprawie ekologicznej i konwencjonalnej. Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering, 2010, 55(3): 219-223.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Lemaire G., Gastal F. 1997. N uptake and distribution in plant canopies. In: Lemaire G. (ed.) Diagnosis of the nitrogen in crops. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: 3-43.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Lammerts van Bueren E.T., Jones S.S.,Tamm L., Murphy K.M., Myers J.R., Leifert C., Messmer M.M.: The need to breed crop varieties suitable for organic farming, using wheat, tomato and broccoli as examples: A review. NJAS Wageningen, Journal of Life Sciences, 2011, 58: 193-205.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Lenc L., Kuś J., Sadowski Cz.: Fuzarioza kłosów i ziarna pszenicy ozimej (Fusarium spp.) w różnych systemach uprawy. Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering, 56 (4): 32-37.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Löschenberger F., Fleck A., Grausgruber H., Hetzendorfer H., Hof G., Lafferty J., Marn M., Neumayer A., Pfaffinger G., Birschitzky J.: Breeding for organic agriculture: the example of winter wheat in Austria. Euphytica, 2008, 163: 469-480.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Murphy K.M., Campbell K.G., Lyon S.R., Jones S.S.: Evidence of varietal adaptation to organic farming systems. Field Crops Research, 2007, 102: 172-177.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Stalenga J. Applicability of different indices to evaluate nutrient status of winter wheat in the organic system. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2007, 30: 351-365.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Stalenga J.: Zastosowanie testu SPAD do oceny stanu odżywienia azotem pszenicy ozimej w różnych systemach produkcji roślinnej. Nawozy i Nawożenie, 2002, 2 (11): 137144.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Stalenga J.: Plonowanie, stan odżywienia oraz efektywność wykorzystania składników nawozowych (NPK) przez dawne i współczesne odmiany pszenicy ozimej uprawiane w ekologicznym systemie produkcji roślinnej. Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering, 2009, 54 (4): 106-119.
Google Scholar
 
 
Share
Send by email
RELATED ARTICLE
The influence of hot water treatment on the incidence of postharvest diseases and quality of apples
Possibility of the control of apple blossom weevil Anthonomus pomorum L. in organic apple growing system
The comparison of the competitiveness against weeds of 14 winter wheat varieties cultivated in organic farming system in different parts of the country
Comparison of macroelement contents in the winter wheat grain from organic and conventional farms
Evaluation of legume-cereal mixtures in organic farming as raw material for silage production
Indexes
 
Keywords index
Topics index
Authors index
eISSN:2719-423X
ISSN:1642-686X
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2025 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top