Current issue
Online First
Archive
Instructions for Authors
Guide for Authors
Peer Review Policy
Research Ethics Policy
Ghostwriting and Guest Authorship
Copyright
Open Access Policy
Plagiarism
About the Journal
Aim and Scope
Scientific Board
Publisher
Editorial Board
Indexing in Databases
Personal Data Protection
Repository Policy
Contact
ORIGINAL PAPER
Headers for rape harvesting
Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2007;52(1):62-67
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The seed losses in working and studio researches of harvest headers were determined. It was resulted that the most losses of rapeseed were generated at traditional (classical) headers with passive divider. The modernization of toble the harvest header and active divider of canopy with hydrostatical driver allowed reduced the seed losses at harvest up to 13-18 kg/ha.
REFERENCES (18)
1.
Beismann H., Roller A., Zeitler.: 2003. Assessing the numer of transgenic oilseed rape seed in the soil seedbank of farmer release sile. Aol., 69, 209-215.
3.
Dreszer K., Gieroba J., Roszkowski A.: 1997. Kombajnowy zbiór zbóż. IBMER, Warszawa.
4.
Dreszer K., Gieroba J.: 1986. Problem obniżenia strat nasion przy zbiorze rzepaku. Nowe Rolnictwo, 6, 6-8.
5.
Gamdzyk M, Konowrocki A.: 1969. Zbiór rzepaku dwufazowy i jednofazowy. Nowe Rolnictwo, 12, 17-18.
6.
Götz, R., Ammer, F.: 2000. Ergebnisse der Anwendung von Liberty in transgenera Winterraps in Thtiringen. J. Plant Dis. Prot. XVII, 397-401. (Special Issue).
7.
Gruber, S, Pekrun, C, Claupein, W.: 2002. Variation of secondary dormancy in genetically modified and conventionally bred oilseed rape. VII. Congress of the European Society of Agronomy, Cordoba, Spain, 15th-18th July 2002, pp. 187-188.
8.
Grzybek A. i inni: 2005. Stan i kierunki rozwoju techniki oraz infrastruktury rolniczej w Polsce. IBMER, Warszawa.
9.
Hobson R.N., Bruce D.M.: 2002. Seede losses when cutting a standing crop of oilseed rape with two types of combine harvester header, Biosystems Engineering 81(3), 281-286.
10.
Ostrowska D.: 2002. Stan i perspektywy produkcji rzepaku w Polsce i krajach Unii Europejskiej. Wieś Jutra, 1/2, 4-8.
11.
Rosiak E.: 2000. Rynek roślin oleistych w Polsce. Rośliny oleiste, t. XXI, 225-234.
13.
Spiess E., Wildbolz P.: 1983. Erntererluste bei Raps. Blatter fur Landtechnik, 230, 1-3.
14.
Szot B., Grochowicz M., Tys J., Dobrzański B., Falęcki A., Rutko T., Stępniewski A., Szpryngiel M., Żak W.: 1994. Ograniczenie strat nasion rzepaku (Sprawozdanie merytoryczne) IA-PAN, Lublin.
15.
Żak W.: 2006. Kryteria doboru optymalnej metody zbioru rzepaku. Rozprawa doktorska.
17.
www.masseyferuson.com. Das Internationale Magazuin von Massey-Ferguson, No. 20, 2005.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2719-423X |
| ISSN: | 1642-686X |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
