ORIGINAL PAPER
Changes in the values of selected parameters taking place during composting of pine bark with plants
 
 
More details
Hide details
 
Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 2012;57(3):41-46
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
In forestry, composts constitute a special kind of fertilizers which are used, primarily, for the fertilization of light soils. Their role consists, first of all, in the improvement of properties of these soils. One of the by-products used for compost production is bark, especially, pine bark which is characterized, among others, by low nitrogen content. For that reason, irrespective of its origin, nitrogen supplementation is necessary. It can be added in the form of mineral, for example urea or ammonium nitrate or organic nitrogen (chicken faeces, farmyard manure, etc.). Bearing in mind economic realities, frequently, plants and their mixtures are often used as sources of nitrogen. This study presents results of investigations regarding composting of pine bark (4 m3) supplemented with plant green material (serradella, buckwheat, field pea and vetch). The mass of the added mixture plant material amounted to 2.0 and 3.5 Mgźheap-1, respectively. One of the experimental treatments was bark alone or bark supplemented with urea. Significant differences were found in values of the examined parameters and the impact of each factor on the level and dynamics of these changes varied. The dry matter content was determined, primarily, by time (F0.01=849.9) and as the content of organic matter (F0.01=713.20) as well as the content of crude nitrogen (F0.01=146.61) by composition of the heap. It was found that losses of total nitrogen (mainly during the final stages of composting) were the greatest in composts supplemented with plant material.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Demirbas A.: Heavy metal adsorption onto agro-based waste materials: A review. J. Hazard. Mater., 2008, 157, 2-3, 220-229.
 
2.
Dickson N., Richard Th., Kozlowski R.: Composting to reduce the wastes stream. NRAES-43, Ithaca, New York, 1992. pp. 53.
 
3.
Fengel D., Wegener G.: Wood - Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1989, 613 pp.
 
4.
Filipek Z.: Produkcja kompostu korowego metoda amoniakalną. Kraków: NOT, 1981, 7, 97-103.
 
5.
Filipek Z., Duda J., Drogosz S.: Zastosowanie kompostowanej kory świerkowej do produkcji sadzonek świerka pospolitego. Sylwan, 1992, 9, 27-32.
 
6.
Finstein M.S., Miller F.C., Strom P.F.: Waste treatment composting as a controlled system. Biotechnology, 1986, 8, 396-443.
 
7.
Foster W.J., Wright R.D., Alley M.M., Yeager T.B.: Ammonium adsorption on pine-bark growing medium. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1983, 108, 548-551.
 
8.
Guedes-de-Carvalho R.A., Gonzalez-Beca C.G., Neves O.R., Sol-Pereira M.C.: Composting of pine and eucalyptus barks. Bioresource Technol., 1991, 38(1), 51-63.
 
9.
Guerrero F., Gasco J.M., Herna′ndez-Apaolaza L.: Use of pine bark and sewage sludge compost as components of substrates for Pinea pinea and Cupressus arizonica production. J. of Plant Nutr., 2002, 25, 1, 129-141.
 
10.
Harkin J.M., Rowe J.W.: Bark and its possible uses. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Research note, FPL-091, Madison 1971, pp. 60.
 
11.
Herna`ndez-Apaolaza L., Guerrero F.: Comparison between pine bark and coconut husk sorption capacity of metals and nitrate when mixed with sewage sludge. Bioresource Technol., 2008, 99(6), 1544-1548.
 
12.
Hoitink, H.A.J. and Poole H.A.: Bark compost use in container media. Compost Sci., 1980, 21, 3, 38-41.
 
13.
Janowicz L.: Biomasa w Polsce. Energetyka, 2006, 6, 601-604.
 
14.
Kallio H., Tikanmäki E.: Composting of sewage sludge and other wastes from food processing plant in Finland. Ann. Agric. Fenn., 1982, 21, 2, 91-102.
 
15.
Krzywy E., Iżewska A., Wołoszyk Cz.: Zmiany składu chemicznego w czasie kompostowania wycierki ziemniaczanej z osadem ściekowym. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol., 2004, 499: 173-180.
 
16.
Kuo S., Ortiz-Escobar M.E., Hue N.V., Hummel R.L.: Composting and compost utilization for agronomic and container crops. Res. Devel. Environ. Biol., 2004, 1, 451-513.
 
17.
Liang C., Das K.C., McClendon R.W.: The influence of temperature and moisture contents regimes on the aerobic microbial activity of a biosolids composting blend. Bioresour. Technol., 2003, 55, 201-206.
 
18.
McDougall G.J., Morrison I.M., Stewart D., Weyers J.D.B., Hillman J.R.: Plant fibres: Botany, chemistry and processing for industrial use. J. Sci. Food Agric., 1993, 62, 1-20.
 
19.
Mondini C., Fornasier F., Sinicco T.: Enzymatic activituy as a parameter for the characterization of the composting process. Soil Biology&Biochemistry, 2004, 36, 1587-1594.
 
20.
Orlando U.S., Baes A.U., Nishijima W., Okada M. Preparation of agricultural residue anion exchangers and nitrate maximum adsorption capacity. Chemosphere, 2002, 48(10), 1041-1046.
 
21.
On-Farm Composting Handbook. NRAES-54, Cooperative Extension Service, Ithaca, New York, 1992, (Rynk R. Ed.), 186 pp.
 
22.
Prosiński S.: Chemia drewna. Warszawa: PWRiL, 1984, ss. 474.
 
23.
Riberio H.M., Romero A.M., Pereira H., Borges P., Cabral F., Vasconcelos E.: Evaluation of a compost obtained from forestry wastes and solid phase of pig slurry as a substrate for seedlings production. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98, 3294-3297.
 
24.
Roberts A.W.L., Smith I.E.: Potassium nutrition of greenhouse cucumbers grown in pine bark and sawdust. In: Proceedings of the International Congress on Soilless Culture, The Secretariat of ISOSC (ed.), International Society for Soilless Culture, Wageningen, Netherlands, l988, pp. 417-428.
 
25.
Romero A.M., P. H. Borges. P., Cabral F., Vasconcelos E.: Evaluation of a compost obtained from forestry wastes and solid phase of pig slurry as a substrate for seedlings production. Bioresour. Technol., 2007. 98, 17, 3294-3297.
 
26.
Verdonck O.: Reviewing and evaluation of new materials used as substrates. Acta Horticulare, 1983, 150, 467-473.
 
eISSN:2719-423X
ISSN:1642-686X
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top